Bianca Censori was to to her old fashion ways as she stepped out in a pair of sizzling hotpants following her demure court appearance earlier this month.
During the outing, Bianca, who is famous for her scantily-clad looks, including her nearly nude 2025 appearance, appeared unusually conservative in a black cardigan paired with a long skirt.
However, in stark contrast, the architect, 31, showcased her figure in the barely-there shorts and a sheer top as she arrived at a studio on Wednesday.
The tiny shorts showcased her long legs, while she also elongated her stature with a pair of heeled mint pumps for the sun-soaked outing.
Bianca also showed off her ample assets in the figure-hugging top, which was layered under a long-sleeved cropped blue shirt.
She wore her cropped black locks swept back into a bun and opted for a matte pallet of make-up to complete her eye-catching daytime look.
Bianca arrived at the studio in a black Porsche before greeting a friend and heading inside, according to onlookers.
Bianca looked almost unrecognisable as she arrived at a courthouse to testify in a , debuting a modest look far removed from her usual risqué ensembles.
Bianca Censori was to to her old fashion ways as she stepped out in a pair of sizzling hotpants following her demure court appearance earlier this month
The architect, 31, showcased her figure in the barely-there shorts and a sheer top as she arrived at a Los Angeles studio on Wednesday
During the recent court outing, Bianca, who is famous for her scantily-clad looks, including her nearly nude 2025 Grammys appearance, appeared unusually conservative in a black cardigan paired with a long skirt
Her towering heels gave a subtle nod to her normally glamorous style, but her hair was swept back into a tight bun and she wore spectacles, completing the understated ensemble.
Bianca arrived to testify shortly after plaintiff Tony Saxon was seen entering the Los Angeles Superior Court.
It has since been revealed that Kanye and his team are taking a victory lap after a jury awarded a contractor suing him $140,000 - 'a small fraction' of the $1.7 million he had been seeking with the litigation.
His spokesperson Milo Yiannopoulos told the Daily Mail in a statement that the contractor, Saxon, recovered 'only a small fraction of what his lawyers demanded' with the $140,000 - after asking the jury for 'approximately $1.7 million.'
Yiannopoulos said the jury rejected almost all of [Saxon's] claims in the case, which saw both West and his spouse take the stand to testify.
'Although the jury found that Saxon qualified as an employee for certain purposes,' he said, 'they awarded no damages for lost wages, overtime, waiting-time penalties, retaliation, punitive damages, or any other statutory penalties.
'The only damages awarded were $140,000 related to Saxon’s claim that he was injured while working on the property.'
West Coast Trial Lawyers attorney Neama Rahmani told the Daily Mail Wednesday that his client Saxon was 'relieved' and 'vindicated' as the case drew to a close.
The verdict handed down to West on Wednesday was split into $100,000 for Saxon's medical expenses, past and present; and $40,000 for past pain and suffering, Rolling Stone reported after reviewing the court ruling.
Saxon did not get anything for future pain and suffering or punitive damages, according to legal docs reviewed by the outlet.
West had not been acting in 'malice, oppression, or fraud' in firing Saxon from the construction project, which the jury ruled was not a wrongful termination, according to legal docs.
The look perfectly displayed her honed physique
Bianca also showed off her ample assets in the figure-hugging top, which was layered under a long-sleeved cropped blue shirt
'It took a lot of discussion to get to $140,000,' a juror in the case told the outlet. 'Some people wanted to go higher. We thought [Saxon] was injured, but there were too many other nebulous things to consider.'
Rahmani said of Wednesday's ruling, 'Admittedly, we won some claims, we lost some claims - it was a mixed verdict - I'm not gonna say that it was a clean sweep by any stretch, but the fact that the jury found merit in our claims, found that [Saxon] was an employee, found that [Saxon] was injured on the job ... they gave him damages for his medical expenses - this is the law.'
Rahmani told the Daily Mail that the case involving Saxon marked the first time the rapper 'had ever testified in court,' adding, 'We have no problem litigating against Ye - we're the first law firm to push a case against Ye all the way to trial.'
Jurors told Rolling Stone about the Grammy-winning rapper's demeanor when he testified last week.
'He looked at us contemptuously,' a female juror told the outlet. 'It was just a waste of our time. Either he was just bored, or he was falling asleep on the stand. Both are bad options. I was not impressed.'
Another juror said West clearly 'fell asleep' while testifying, adding, 'I was kind of surprised. I could tell he's not what some of my friends who still like him believe.'
West's spokesperson Yiannopoulos said the rapper and his team remain confident they would recoup monies awarded in Wednesday's judgment down the line, due to the jury's finding 'that Saxon acted in the capacity of a contractor and did not qualify for the employee exception under ’s contractor licensing statutes.
'Under California law, an unlicensed contractor cannot recover compensation for work requiring a license. Based on those findings, we believe the damages award is legally barred and will be seeking post-trial relief from the court.'
Yiannopoulos said that Wednesday's ruling 'concludes the first of two lawsuits,' as they're pursuing litigation against 'Saxon and his attorneys, Ron Zambrano and West Coast Trial Lawyers, arising from their recording and publicizing of an unlawful mechanic’s lien' on the Malibu property.
She wore her cropped black locks swept back into a bun and opted for a matte pallet of make-up to complete her eye-catching daytime look
She was seen getting out of her black Porsche
He said 'the lien clouded the home’s title and interfered with its sale, destroying substantial value at the time of sale.'
Rahmani told Daily Mail in response, 'That lawsuit has no merit,' citing legal SLAPP statutes applicable in the situation. He added, 'You can't file a non-meritorious lawsuit against someone for asserting a legal claim - that claim was litigated in court … California law is clear.'
The legal dispute stemmed from an initial arrangement that West and Saxon reached in September 2021. At the time, the rapper was looking to make a series of drastic changes to an oceanfront Malibu mansion he .
Saxon told the court in legal documents that, in fulfilling West's unique specifications, he provided multiple services. They included project management, property caretaker and security. Saxon said in legal documents that he spent up to 16 hours a day working on the remodel, and sometimes had to sleep on the ground with his coat to remain on schedule.
Saxon said in his legal filing that things between him and two months into the endeavor, in November 2021.
The contractor told the court he voiced his opposition to a number of requests West made regarding the renovation of the home.
Saxon said West ordered him to demolish the marble bathrooms and remove all plumbing, windows and electrical equipment.
When West proposed moving large generators inside the house, Saxon told the court he informed West that it would create a major fire hazard.
Saxon said in the suit that West, in response, threatened him and said he would be considered 'an enemy' if he did not fulfill his vision.
Saxon said West told him, 'If you don't do what I say, you're not going to work for me, I'm not gonna be your friend anymore and you'll just see me on TV.'
West Coast Trial Lawyers attorney Neama Rahmani told the Daily Mail that his client Tony Saxon (pictured March 5 in LA) was 'relieved' and 'vindicated' as the case drew to a close
Saxon said in legal documents that he told West he did not watch TV and was promptly fired on the spot and told to 'get the hell out' of the home.
Saxon claimed to the court that West only paid him for one week of work. He sued West for a number of labor code violations, and , and damages.
In the lawsuit, Saxon said the rapper's vision for the home was to make it like 'a bomb shelter from the 1910s', according to NBC News.
'We were going to be gutting all of that out and sort of building him a Bat Cave,' Saxon said, adding the rapper told him he wanted a place he could 'hide from the Clintons in and the Kardashians in'.
While Saxon believed the home was more of an 'art project,' he later came to realize West actually wanted to reside there.
West 'wanted no electricity,' Saxon said. 'He only wanted plants. He only wanted candles. He only wanted battery lights. And he just wanted to have everything open and dark.'
West denied all of the accusations in a November 2023 filing requesting that the lawsuit be dismissed.
Lawyers for the rapper said he was not responsible for the damages Saxon claimed to have suffered and that Saxon performed tasks he was unaware of.
In a series of 2024 photos of the home, disrepair was visible: the floor-to-ceiling windows with views of the ocean had been removed, leaving that side open to the elements.
The inside of the house appeared to be crumbling and the metal railings were rusting after being exposed to the salt air, wind and water at the oceanfront location.
West's Malibu neighbors in 2024 told TMZ his mansion was 'left to rot' and that they had not 'seen anyone around for many months.'
