Gregg Wallace Earns £20,000 Monthly Selling Videos

is understood to be recouping his enormous salary by sending personalised messages to fans after signing up to a video-sharing website. 

The former MasterChef host earned an astonishing £400,000 a year at the BBC before losing his job over 45 upheld claims that he used 'inappropriate sexual language, humour and physical contact' while . 

Wallace, 61, has since joined Cameo, a popular website that enables users to receive personalised messages from a range of celebrities. 

And the disgraced presenter is said to be making a small fortune by selling tailored videos for £40 apiece, with a promise to deliver the completed clip within a seven hour timeframe. 

Wallace is understood to be the fourth busiest celebrity on the platform, with his estimated earnings understood to be as much as £20,000 a month, according to The Sun.

The former presenter's popularity means he could earn £240,00 a year - more than half of his BBC salary - by churning out video content.  

His messages believed to cover a range of special occasions, among them birthdays and the imminent arrival of Valentine's Day - meaning the MasterChef star has been rather busy over recent weeks.  

Wallace has also given social media followers a preview of what to expect on his personal Instagram platform, where he regularly promotes his services as a celebrity messenger.  

'Have you forgotten Valentine’s Day?' he asks in one recently posted video. 'Don’t worry. My average turnaround is seven hours so you’ve still got time - guys, we’ve got this.'

Wallace recently launched a fresh defence against allegations of misconduct on MasterChef, claiming the 45 upheld complaints against him .

The presenter, who was axed from the BBC series last July in the wake of the allegations, insisted that only two complaints were ever raised during his 20-year tenure.

He said the remaining 43 emerged only after 'sensationalised (and untrue)' initial allegations became public in late 2024.

In an explosive Substack post, Wallace claimed the investigation process was 'not a legal one' and that 'the standard of proof would not stand up in a court of law', comparing it instead to an internal human resources (HR) process.

He alleged an 'open invitation' was sent out asking anyone who had 'ever worked with me (or met me) to come forward and tell their stories' after his reputation was already 'being dragged through the mud'.